Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1441 - 1450 of 29821 for des.
Search results 1441 - 1450 of 29821 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, that I review de novo. See State v. Snider, 2003 WI App 172, ¶10, 266 Wis. 2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194215 - 2017-09-21
a question of law, that I review de novo. See State v. Snider, 2003 WI App 172, ¶10, 266 Wis. 2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194215 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 96
, and we review questions of law de novo. See State v. Kramer, 2001 WI 132, ¶17, 248 Wis. 2d 1009, 637 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32841 - 2011-06-14
, and we review questions of law de novo. See State v. Kramer, 2001 WI 132, ¶17, 248 Wis. 2d 1009, 637 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32841 - 2011-06-14
Sheldon Vielie v. Aurora Pharmacy, Inc.
as the trial court and review the matter de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18092 - 2005-05-10
as the trial court and review the matter de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18092 - 2005-05-10
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
. § 66.021(2). ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2813 - 2005-03-31
. § 66.021(2). ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2813 - 2005-03-31
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
. § 66.021(2). ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2814 - 2005-03-31
. § 66.021(2). ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2814 - 2005-03-31
WI App 100 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1045 Complete Title...
§ 125.12(2)(d) contemplates a de novo review of the City’s decision. Accordingly, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86314 - 2012-09-26
§ 125.12(2)(d) contemplates a de novo review of the City’s decision. Accordingly, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86314 - 2012-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
Nelly De La Trinidad, Individually, and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Elizabeth Callejas-De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31597 - 2008-01-22
Nelly De La Trinidad, Individually, and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Elizabeth Callejas-De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31597 - 2008-01-22
Rubidell Resort Condominium Association, Inc. v. James Welch
commissioner conducted a trial, according to the small claims procedure in use in Milwaukee County, a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2718 - 2005-03-31
commissioner conducted a trial, according to the small claims procedure in use in Milwaukee County, a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2718 - 2005-03-31
John Erickson v. City of Janesville
. STANDARD OF REVIEW We review a trial court's grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8644 - 2005-03-31
. STANDARD OF REVIEW We review a trial court's grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patricia Marie Jirschele v. Steven Joseph Jirschele
DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. No. 99-2668 2 ¶1 VERGERONT, J.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16102 - 2017-09-21
DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. No. 99-2668 2 ¶1 VERGERONT, J.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16102 - 2017-09-21