Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1441 - 1450 of 18961 for inmates search.

Terrance James Shaw v. Department of Corrections
, a prison inmate, petitioned to change his name to Reverend Terrance James Shaw, D.B.S., Ph.D., D.D. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7202 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - December
from thousands of inmates hoping to reduce their sentences to reflect the penalties that ultimately
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921 - 2017-09-20

State v. John C. Setagord
), 939.62 and 939.05, Stats. The crimes were committed when Setagord and two other inmates attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8543 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John C. Setagord
, STATS. The crimes were committed when Setagord and two other inmates attempted to escape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8543 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
is a resident of the state and is not an inmate of a state prison, county jail, or house of corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36329 - 2014-09-15

Kevin Thomas v. David H. Schwarz
of pre-TIS and TIS confinement served before the inmate begins any nonconfinement period of parole plus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25770 - 2006-08-06

Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
Lindell is a prison inmate and the respondents are officials or employees of the DOC. When the La Crosse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6887 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
. BACKGROUND ¶3 Nathaniel Lindell is a prison inmate and the respondents are officials or employees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6887 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 110
an inmate’s mail-order hobby materials. Parratt, 451 U.S. at 529. The Court held that it was “difficult
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52274 - 2014-09-15

2010 WI APP 110
employees misplaced an inmate’s mail-order hobby materials. Parratt, 451 U.S. at 529. The Court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52274 - 2010-08-08