Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14401 - 14410 of 38083 for ph d.

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 13-16 - Comments from Wisconsin Judicial Council Evidence & Civil Procedure Committee
, it is sometimes unclear who has the duty to act. For example, proposed Wis. Stat. § 887.24(3)(d) states that “[o
/supreme/docs/1316commentsjudcoun.pdf - 2014-09-08

[PDF] State of the Judiciary Address 2020
David D. Conway, Dane County Judge Jack L. Dávila, Milwaukee County Judge Jacob B. Frost, Dane
/publications/speeches/docs/judaddress20.pdf - 2020-11-05

[PDF] Motion to File Corrected Version of Proposed Maps (BLOC)
the technical corrections in BLOC Petitioners’ assembly proposal, and attached as Exhibit D is a set of maps
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motioncorrectmapsbloc.pdf - 2022-01-04

[PDF] Rules petition 08-24
to a preliminary hearing; (d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known
/supreme/docs/0824petition.pdf - 2008-09-30

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
Service in an Investigative Matter. Office ofLawyer Regulation v. Danny Garcia, Case No. 2021XX647-D
/services/public/lawyerreg/statuspublic/garcia.pdf - 2025-05-09

State v. Virgil Marzell Smith
a movie with a man she knew as “D” at his residence. D then said he would give her a ride home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20879 - 2006-01-09

[PDF] State v. Anthony J. Dentici, Jr.
at ¶26. Rather, the Magnuson court “acknowledge[d] the importance of reading statutes in pari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4110 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] David R. Umhoefer v. Police and Fire Commission of the City of Mequon
for Ozaukee County: JOSEPH D. MCCORMACK, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4737 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(which droppe[d] her monthly repayment plan [to the IRS] to the current $350 per month). The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934519 - 2025-04-02

State v. St. Croix County
plan apply in both administration zones. See Kiernat v. County of Chisago, 564 F. Supp. 1089 (D. Minn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5378 - 2005-03-31