Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14411 - 14420 of 24492 for extending.
Search results 14411 - 14420 of 24492 for extending.
CA Blank Order
confinement plus five years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed. Appellate counsel indicates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131671 - 2015-02-17
confinement plus five years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed. Appellate counsel indicates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131671 - 2015-02-17
[PDF]
State v. Maurice Simmons
and five years of extended supervision, to be served consecutively to any other sentence. In this pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18374 - 2017-09-21
and five years of extended supervision, to be served consecutively to any other sentence. In this pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18374 - 2017-09-21
WI App 140 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP837-CR Complete Title...
exception to the exclusionary rule should not be extended to cases involving reliance on foreign authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104179 - 2005-03-31
exception to the exclusionary rule should not be extended to cases involving reliance on foreign authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104179 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
at the hearing indicated the permit was never intended to be extended to allow for expansion to a residential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28212 - 2009-11-23
at the hearing indicated the permit was never intended to be extended to allow for expansion to a residential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28212 - 2009-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
was sentenced to thirteen years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision on each count, with all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51951 - 2005-03-31
was sentenced to thirteen years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision on each count, with all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51951 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
in an eight-year term, consisting of five years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104314 - 2013-11-11
in an eight-year term, consisting of five years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104314 - 2013-11-11
State v. Tracy L. Singleton
of imprisonment, including fifteen years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26300 - 2005-03-31
of imprisonment, including fifteen years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26300 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hours as in Lomagro, it would also be reasonable to extend the holding in Lomagro to conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032425 - 2025-11-05
hours as in Lomagro, it would also be reasonable to extend the holding in Lomagro to conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032425 - 2025-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS
- and five-year respective periods of initial confinement and extended supervision. Bailey appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41824 - 2009-10-05
- and five-year respective periods of initial confinement and extended supervision. Bailey appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41824 - 2009-10-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
consecutive terms of three years’ initial confinement and eighteen months’ extended supervision. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36300 - 2014-09-15
consecutive terms of three years’ initial confinement and eighteen months’ extended supervision. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36300 - 2014-09-15