Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14411 - 14420 of 29662 for name.
Search results 14411 - 14420 of 29662 for name.
COURT OF APPEALS
to enforce a state statute must be brought in the name of the state under § 778.02. [4] There appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48251 - 2010-03-24
to enforce a state statute must be brought in the name of the state under § 778.02. [4] There appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48251 - 2010-03-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a forfeiture enforceable by an action in the name of the State. WIS. STAT. § 103.13(8) (“Any employer who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49311 - 2014-09-15
is a forfeiture enforceable by an action in the name of the State. WIS. STAT. § 103.13(8) (“Any employer who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49311 - 2014-09-15
State v. Marvin Jost
contain the information Jost alleges—namely, that Nichole’s mother says she lies—that information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6487 - 2005-03-31
contain the information Jost alleges—namely, that Nichole’s mother says she lies—that information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6487 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marika W.
to terminate her rights to Brittany and Tiffany, namely that Marika W. failed to assume her parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5961 - 2005-03-31
to terminate her rights to Brittany and Tiffany, namely that Marika W. failed to assume her parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5961 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patrick Gary
with anything his lawyer had said and that “I’d like to apologize to the victim, [naming her], and also to my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16257 - 2005-03-31
with anything his lawyer had said and that “I’d like to apologize to the victim, [naming her], and also to my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16257 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
or her name thereto.[3] There is nothing in this statute that requires the district attorney to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57748 - 2014-09-15
or her name thereto.[3] There is nothing in this statute that requires the district attorney to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57748 - 2014-09-15
Jimi Thornton v. Walter S. Polacheck, M.D.
at another scheduling conference on October 5, 1994. Thornton also failed to provide the names of expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8673 - 2005-03-31
at another scheduling conference on October 5, 1994. Thornton also failed to provide the names of expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8673 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated, not just drinking. They were associated with a specific vehicle, namely the Cavalier. A brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90656 - 2014-09-15
intoxicated, not just drinking. They were associated with a specific vehicle, namely the Cavalier. A brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90656 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth J. Erdmann
knock at her door and call her name at 2:30 a.m., but she did not answer the door. Martin testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13138 - 2005-03-31
knock at her door and call her name at 2:30 a.m., but she did not answer the door. Martin testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13138 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the officer could have reasonably suspected that Schrameyer was otherwise engaging in unlawful conduct, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29988 - 2007-08-15
that the officer could have reasonably suspected that Schrameyer was otherwise engaging in unlawful conduct, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29988 - 2007-08-15