Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14411 - 14420 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 14411 - 14420 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Robert Vines, Jr. v. Ken Sondalle
because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the contract Demopoulos claimed they had for melding the parts of two large trucks to make one road- worthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253204 - 2020-02-05
the contract Demopoulos claimed they had for melding the parts of two large trucks to make one road- worthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253204 - 2020-02-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of counsel claim on the ground that it was procedurally barred under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251796 - 2019-12-26
ineffective assistance of counsel claim on the ground that it was procedurally barred under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251796 - 2019-12-26
[PDF]
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
He claims he was prejudiced by the erroneous admission of other acts evidence, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21
He claims he was prejudiced by the erroneous admission of other acts evidence, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21
State v. William Avery
postconviction motion.[1] Avery claims that: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion.[1] Avery claims that: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
regarding the amount of restitution, if any, that the victim claims. The court shall give the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
regarding the amount of restitution, if any, that the victim claims. The court shall give the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Guy Douglas
claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case because: (1) an improper definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11981 - 2017-09-21
claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case because: (1) an improper definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11981 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to sentencing. He claimed that he “was not fully aware of the factual allegations in the complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
to sentencing. He claimed that he “was not fully aware of the factual allegations in the complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for failing to claim trial counsel was ineffective for failing to: (1) raise Fourth and Fourteenth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144242 - 2017-09-21
for failing to claim trial counsel was ineffective for failing to: (1) raise Fourth and Fourteenth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144242 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael R. Remmel
plea, claiming it was not knowingly entered because the circuit court failed to inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19253 - 2005-08-08
plea, claiming it was not knowingly entered because the circuit court failed to inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19253 - 2005-08-08