Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14421 - 14430 of 98625 for civil court case status online.
Search results 14421 - 14430 of 98625 for civil court case status online.
State v. Amanda A. Ringler
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 9, 2002 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3984 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 9, 2002 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3984 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Amanda A. Ringler
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 9, 2002 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3984 - 2017-09-20
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 9, 2002 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3984 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. In this case, the circuit court granted the State’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds phase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53678 - 2010-08-25
. In this case, the circuit court granted the State’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds phase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53678 - 2010-08-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
repeater status. Second, the circuit court did not increase Logan’s sentence based on his repeater
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310552 - 2020-12-03
repeater status. Second, the circuit court did not increase Logan’s sentence based on his repeater
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310552 - 2020-12-03
State v. James D. Crochiere
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 3, 2003 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5449 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 3, 2003 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5449 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is incorrect. The circuit court’s online docket entries (CCAP) currently show that Witz was charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105735 - 2017-09-21
is incorrect. The circuit court’s online docket entries (CCAP) currently show that Witz was charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105735 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dustin A. Cummings
impermissibly punished him for taking the cases to trial. Rather, the trial court’s observation pertained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24710 - 2006-04-04
impermissibly punished him for taking the cases to trial. Rather, the trial court’s observation pertained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24710 - 2006-04-04
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Parrish
2002 WI App 263 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-2524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3038 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 263 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-2524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3038 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Diane M. Somers
of the “Enforcement Agency” was “Jefferson Sheriff,” and when the trial court called the case for hearing, it stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
of the “Enforcement Agency” was “Jefferson Sheriff,” and when the trial court called the case for hearing, it stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
State v. Diane M. Somers
that the name of the “Enforcement Agency” was “Jefferson Sheriff,” and when the trial court called the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2015-06-30
that the name of the “Enforcement Agency” was “Jefferson Sheriff,” and when the trial court called the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2015-06-30