Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14421 - 14430 of 29772 for des.
Search results 14421 - 14430 of 29772 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination that this court decides de novo. See id. ¶14 We need not address both elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605963 - 2022-12-29
determination that this court decides de novo. See id. ¶14 We need not address both elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605963 - 2022-12-29
State v. Frederick J. Brissette
on the interpretation of § 980.04(2), Stats., which is a question of law we review de novo. See Grosse v. Protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14317 - 2005-03-31
on the interpretation of § 980.04(2), Stats., which is a question of law we review de novo. See Grosse v. Protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14317 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo. State v. Hindsley, 2000 WI App 130
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143503 - 2015-06-24
by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo. State v. Hindsley, 2000 WI App 130
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143503 - 2015-06-24
WI App 87 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP812 Complete Title o...
on the application of legal principles to undisputed facts, and so our review is de novo. See Brown v. State, 230
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32628 - 2011-06-14
on the application of legal principles to undisputed facts, and so our review is de novo. See Brown v. State, 230
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32628 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and prejudicial to his or her client’s defense is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Hunt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251969 - 2020-01-03
and prejudicial to his or her client’s defense is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Hunt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251969 - 2020-01-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30890 - 2014-09-15
, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30890 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Kraenzler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139741 - 2015-04-14
court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Kraenzler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139741 - 2015-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. We review de novo the legal questions of whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82437 - 2012-05-15
a question of law. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. We review de novo the legal questions of whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82437 - 2012-05-15
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
. The proof of either the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13111 - 2017-09-21
. The proof of either the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13111 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jacquelyn A. LoPiccolo
decide de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis. 2d 288, 296, 517 N.W.2d 494 (1994). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20008 - 2005-10-19
decide de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis. 2d 288, 296, 517 N.W.2d 494 (1994). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20008 - 2005-10-19