Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14421 - 14430 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 14421 - 14430 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
State v. Nels H. Rieth
) and 943.20(1)(a) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6186 - 2005-03-31
) and 943.20(1)(a) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6186 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael R. Remmel
plea, claiming it was not knowingly entered because the circuit court failed to inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19253 - 2005-08-08
plea, claiming it was not knowingly entered because the circuit court failed to inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19253 - 2005-08-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The federal court granted PDQ summary judgment on Balele’s discrimination claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167921 - 2017-09-21
. The federal court granted PDQ summary judgment on Balele’s discrimination claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167921 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, they claim, in the belief that the Decision One mortgage debt was gone. In 2016, the Craycrafts applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236115 - 2019-02-27
, they claim, in the belief that the Decision One mortgage debt was gone. In 2016, the Craycrafts applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236115 - 2019-02-27
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. He alleged that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to claim trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144242 - 2015-07-06
for postconviction relief. He alleged that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to claim trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144242 - 2015-07-06
State v. William Avery
postconviction motion.[1] Avery claims that: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion.[1] Avery claims that: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Guy Douglas
claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case because: (1) an improper definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11981 - 2017-09-21
claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case because: (1) an improper definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11981 - 2017-09-21
State v. Guy Douglas
to a secured facility for treatment. Douglas claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11981 - 2005-03-31
to a secured facility for treatment. Douglas claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11981 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment dismissing its claims against various insurance companies (the Insurers). NSP claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70365 - 2014-09-15
a judgment dismissing its claims against various insurance companies (the Insurers). NSP claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70365 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because the circuit court was biased. The record does not support Young’s claims. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256662 - 2020-03-18
because the circuit court was biased. The record does not support Young’s claims. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256662 - 2020-03-18