Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14421 - 14430 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 14421 - 14430 of 64042 for records/1000.
State v. Timothy L. Kaelin
note that there is some confusion in the record regarding the manner in which Albert and Randy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8017 - 2005-03-31
note that there is some confusion in the record regarding the manner in which Albert and Randy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8017 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and supplement, and we have conducted an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032713 - 2025-11-04
report and supplement, and we have conducted an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032713 - 2025-11-04
Elizabeth Freer v. M&I Marshall & Ilsley Corporation
and the summary-judgment record: [W]e are disturbed that Freer’s complaint asserts things that conflict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19865 - 2005-10-10
and the summary-judgment record: [W]e are disturbed that Freer’s complaint asserts things that conflict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19865 - 2005-10-10
State v. Equinees A. Boyles
that trial counsel did not confer with him adequately before the plea. The record of the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10334 - 2005-03-31
that trial counsel did not confer with him adequately before the plea. The record of the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10334 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald H. Gilpin
Gilpin states at several points in his brief that his “convictions” should be overturned. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14262 - 2014-09-15
Gilpin states at several points in his brief that his “convictions” should be overturned. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14262 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the No. 2023AP1173-CR 2 briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855996 - 2024-10-02
of the No. 2023AP1173-CR 2 briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855996 - 2024-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and supplement, and we have conducted an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032713 - 2025-11-04
report and supplement, and we have conducted an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032713 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
$2,537,265.92. No. 2023AP185 2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821311 - 2024-07-02
$2,537,265.92. No. 2023AP185 2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821311 - 2024-07-02
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
in “actual prosecutorial vindictiveness,” and we agree that the record before the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
in “actual prosecutorial vindictiveness,” and we agree that the record before the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) it permitted the State to elicit opinions expressed in department of corrections (DOC) records regarding Dahl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52368 - 2010-07-20
) it permitted the State to elicit opinions expressed in department of corrections (DOC) records regarding Dahl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52368 - 2010-07-20