Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14421 - 14430 of 64077 for records/1000.
Search results 14421 - 14430 of 64077 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
, “a reviewing court may not find, based on the record, that there was a valid waiver of counsel.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59567 - 2011-01-31
, “a reviewing court may not find, based on the record, that there was a valid waiver of counsel.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59567 - 2011-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Nothing in the record suggests that any police officer made statements under oath or affirmation when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89015 - 2012-11-05
. Nothing in the record suggests that any police officer made statements under oath or affirmation when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89015 - 2012-11-05
State v. Mack McClinton
) (appellant responsible for assembling and submitting record); Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(e) & (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14222 - 2005-03-31
) (appellant responsible for assembling and submitting record); Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(e) & (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14222 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the records—as mandated by Anders— and counsel’s reports, we conclude there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538708 - 2022-06-29
of the records—as mandated by Anders— and counsel’s reports, we conclude there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538708 - 2022-06-29
State v. Willie Nunn
members, Jermaine Smith and Cornelius Blair.[2] The record in this case is not as fully developed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19093 - 2005-07-25
members, Jermaine Smith and Cornelius Blair.[2] The record in this case is not as fully developed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19093 - 2005-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2019, that the defense was seeking any additional video or audio recording of Rose’s interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667870 - 2023-06-13
, 2019, that the defense was seeking any additional video or audio recording of Rose’s interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667870 - 2023-06-13
COURT OF APPEALS
was the sheriff’s deputy, although the court also had the benefit of listening to an audio recording of discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62519 - 2011-04-06
was the sheriff’s deputy, although the court also had the benefit of listening to an audio recording of discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62519 - 2011-04-06
Jens O. Luebow v. Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing
not consider the facts of record, including the board’s own failure to be cooperative during the proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3660 - 2005-03-31
not consider the facts of record, including the board’s own failure to be cooperative during the proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3660 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The record presented at the hearing includes the following relevant evidence. ¶3 Vallier was employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235795 - 2019-02-26
). The record presented at the hearing includes the following relevant evidence. ¶3 Vallier was employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235795 - 2019-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
affidavit. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(f). Based upon an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252662 - 2020-01-17
affidavit. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(f). Based upon an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252662 - 2020-01-17