Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14431 - 14440 of 30128 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. Mikrut, 273 Wis. 2d 76, ¶7. The State asserts that Cotton forfeited his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18

Debra J. Wall v. Michael K. Wall
which we review de novo. See Seep v. State Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis.2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142, 144 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12252 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a seizure has occurred is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Garcia, 195 Wis. 2d 68, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28648 - 2007-04-04

State v. Michael L., Jr.
a restitution order comports with the statute is, however, subject to our de novo review. State v. Canady, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5302 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The proper measure of damages applicable to a specific claim presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240597 - 2019-05-14

[PDF] State v. Virginia R. Ray
of law No. 02-2629-CR 4 that we review de novo. State v. Hughes, 218 Wis. 2d 538, 543, 582
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5723 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. We review the language of a statute de novo. Clean Wis., Inc. v. DNR, 2021 WI 72, ¶10, 398 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840099 - 2024-08-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. “The application of a statute to the facts of the case is a question of law that we review de novo.” Waller v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26

COURT OF APPEALS
statutes to a set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88073 - 2012-10-10

COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05