Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14431 - 14440 of 18687 for quote.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that supports his position. He bases his argument entirely on his interpretation of the above-quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212323 - 2018-05-08

State v. Hilary H. Koch, Jr.
.” Messner v. Briggs & Stratton Corp., 120 Wis.2d 127, 135, 353 N.W.2d 363, 367 (Ct. App. 1984) (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7870 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Pablo Cruz Santana
.” Id. at 663-64, 546 N.W.2d at 119 (quoted source omitted). Judge Kennedy clearly made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12747 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Diamondback Funding, LLC v. Chili's of Wisconsin, Inc.
standard’ ‘ranged from 76 to 90 percent, with 85 percent the modal response’”) (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6845 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Lynn Boxhorn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
.2d 585 (1995) (quoting Maloney v. Wisconsin Power, Light Heat Co., 180 Wis. 546, 547, 193 N.W. 399
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7873 - 2017-09-19

State v. Joel L. Ritchie
a trout in the milk.” M. Frances McNamara, 2,000 Famous Legal quotations 207 (1967) (quoting Henry D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15766 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 227.20(1)(a) (1963-64) and, while that statute did contain the above- quoted language about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243978 - 2019-07-23

State v. Garrett Ely
(1996) (quoted source omitted). “Ambiguity can be found in the words of the statutory provision itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14129 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joshua N. Briggs
-1558-CR 5 Ordinarily, a statement by the supreme court, such as that quoted in Carter, would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12547 - 2017-09-21

Jiayou Zhang v. Xiaoxia Yu
statement, quoted above, that it retained authority “to award attorney fees in the future on an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3330 - 2005-03-31