Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14441 - 14450 of 29969 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14441 - 14450 of 29969 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
NOTICE
…. No. 2007AP1191 5 DISCUSSION ¶7 Questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo. Stephenson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31109 - 2014-09-15
…. No. 2007AP1191 5 DISCUSSION ¶7 Questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo. Stephenson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31109 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48600 - 2010-03-31
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48600 - 2010-03-31
[PDF]
County of Winnebago v. Gary A. Burns
suspicion is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4648 - 2017-09-19
suspicion is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4648 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. See Bantz v. Montgomery Ests., Inc., 163 Wis. 2d 973, 978, 473 N.W.2d 506 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657008 - 2023-05-16
reviews de novo. See Bantz v. Montgomery Ests., Inc., 163 Wis. 2d 973, 978, 473 N.W.2d 506 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657008 - 2023-05-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an incorrect reconsideration standard. ¶7 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159458 - 2017-09-21
an incorrect reconsideration standard. ¶7 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159458 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas D.
. An appellate court is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions of law and must decide the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15718 - 2005-03-31
. An appellate court is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions of law and must decide the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15718 - 2005-03-31
Dorothy McGrane v. John O'Brien
judgment to O’Brien. Dorothy appeals. ¶10 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24800 - 2006-04-11
judgment to O’Brien. Dorothy appeals. ¶10 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24800 - 2006-04-11
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
to the circuit court for a trial de novo. After a jury trial in circuit court in which Schultz proceeded pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15158 - 2017-09-21
to the circuit court for a trial de novo. After a jury trial in circuit court in which Schultz proceeded pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15158 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brett R.T.
. This presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Keith, 175 Wis.2d 75, 78, 498 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13475 - 2005-03-31
. This presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Keith, 175 Wis.2d 75, 78, 498 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13475 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jose S.
de novo, however, whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17899 - 2017-09-21
de novo, however, whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17899 - 2017-09-21