Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14441 - 14450 of 29773 for des.

Town of Waukesha v. City of Waukesha
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2458 - 2005-03-31

County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
these powers is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 Generally, courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4469 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. The threshold inquiry is whether the State breached the plea agreement. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶33. “However, whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201534 - 2017-11-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 301 Wis. 2d 1, ¶8; Hughes, 233 Wis. 2d 280, ¶15. In the second step, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184943 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
to effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31758 - 2014-09-15

State v. Sean M. Daley
with a statutory interpretation question, which we review de novo. See State v. DeLain, 2005 WI 52, ¶11, 280 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2006-01-09

COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. at 66. “The reviewing court has the duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36725 - 2009-06-09

State v. Javier Salgado
, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. ¶11 First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2754 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David M. Beasley
it prejudiced the defendant's defense are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Moffett, 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8155 - 2017-09-19