Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14451 - 14460 of 29969 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14451 - 14460 of 29969 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” or something to that effect. When Shade attempted to de-escalate the situation by standing between Norwood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106032 - 2017-09-21
,” or something to that effect. When Shade attempted to de-escalate the situation by standing between Norwood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106032 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
of the doctrine of claim preclusion is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Kruckenberg v. Harvey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27042 - 2006-11-06
of the doctrine of claim preclusion is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Kruckenberg v. Harvey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27042 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
State v. Timmy Duerr
facts show that a person was under arrest is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11661 - 2017-09-19
facts show that a person was under arrest is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11661 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
meet the legal test for “hardship” de novo; and finally, we review the circuit court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73769 - 2011-11-16
meet the legal test for “hardship” de novo; and finally, we review the circuit court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73769 - 2011-11-16
Ericka Clark v. Devin R. Mudge, M.D.
discretionary determination involving a question of law, we review the question of law de novo and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14980 - 2005-03-31
discretionary determination involving a question of law, we review the question of law de novo and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14980 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tammy J. Erdmann
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5917 - 2005-03-31
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5917 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶8 The circuit court’s conclusion that Andrews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131971 - 2017-09-21
facts is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶8 The circuit court’s conclusion that Andrews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo based on the facts as found by the [trial] court.” Id. (italics added). ¶11 Here, Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185129 - 2017-09-21
de novo based on the facts as found by the [trial] court.” Id. (italics added). ¶11 Here, Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185129 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28390 - 2007-03-13
a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28390 - 2007-03-13
2007 WI APP 149
to invalidate the same document. David appeals. Discussion ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28862 - 2007-06-26
to invalidate the same document. David appeals. Discussion ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28862 - 2007-06-26