Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14451 - 14460 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14451 - 14460 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
Lori Trost v. Keith D. Trost
is a question of law that we decide de novo. Harris v. Harris, 141 Wis. 2d 569, 415 N.W.2d 586 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17594 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we decide de novo. Harris v. Harris, 141 Wis. 2d 569, 415 N.W.2d 586 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17594 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ronald Waites v. Marianne Cooke
of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10516 - 2017-09-20
of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10516 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
written speech presents an issue of statutory interpretation, which this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92099 - 2014-09-15
written speech presents an issue of statutory interpretation, which this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92099 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 432. This is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21
N.W.2d 432. This is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21
State v. Jerry B. Rooni
to arrest him for OWI. Discussion ¶7 On appeal, this court reviews a probable cause determination de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5548 - 2005-03-31
to arrest him for OWI. Discussion ¶7 On appeal, this court reviews a probable cause determination de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5548 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient. Ladd, 323 Wis. 2d 798, ¶7. ¶12 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197316 - 2017-10-04
sufficient. Ladd, 323 Wis. 2d 798, ¶7. ¶12 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197316 - 2017-10-04
City of Milwaukee Post #2874 v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4093 - 2005-03-31
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4093 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Kreutz
statutory and constitutional standards, however, are questions of law this court reviews de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15178 - 2005-03-31
statutory and constitutional standards, however, are questions of law this court reviews de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15178 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bruce B. Jacobson
). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18564 - 2005-06-13
). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18564 - 2005-06-13
State v. Jacquelyn A. LoPiccolo
decide de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis. 2d 288, 296, 517 N.W.2d 494 (1994). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20008 - 2005-10-19
decide de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis. 2d 288, 296, 517 N.W.2d 494 (1994). ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20008 - 2005-10-19