Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14451 - 14460 of 29772 for des.
Search results 14451 - 14460 of 29772 for des.
[PDF]
Tony A. Henderson v. Milwaukee County
submissions in this case presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Damaschke, 150 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9548 - 2017-09-19
submissions in this case presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Damaschke, 150 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9548 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sandra L. Barrette
of review is not de novo, but rather gives “great deference” to the determination of the issuing judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12919 - 2017-09-21
of review is not de novo, but rather gives “great deference” to the determination of the issuing judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12919 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
4 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81567 - 2014-09-15
4 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81567 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Javier Salgado
was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. ¶11 First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2754 - 2017-09-19
was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. ¶11 First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2754 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Susan Shoemaker v. The Hearst Corporation
de novo review in the circuit court. It concluded that Wheaton’s payment to Shoemaker constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3563 - 2017-09-19
de novo review in the circuit court. It concluded that Wheaton’s payment to Shoemaker constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3563 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Sol Coleman, Jr. v. Michael Sullivan
a question of law that we decide de novo. See Spence v. Cooke, 222 Wis.2d 530, 536, 587 N.W.2d 904, 906
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14472 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that we decide de novo. See Spence v. Cooke, 222 Wis.2d 530, 536, 587 N.W.2d 904, 906
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14472 - 2017-09-21
Michelle L. Peters v. Joseph A. Peters
Michelle presented the testimony of Thomas Zoeller, owner of De Pere Business Center. Zoeller, who had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3909 - 2005-03-31
Michelle presented the testimony of Thomas Zoeller, owner of De Pere Business Center. Zoeller, who had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3909 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark H. Price
is termed the “objective test.” As its name implies, this test requires that we review the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
is termed the “objective test.” As its name implies, this test requires that we review the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, based on the undisputed facts or the facts as found by the circuit court, is an issue we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59341 - 2014-09-15
, based on the undisputed facts or the facts as found by the circuit court, is an issue we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59341 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Susan M. Oimoen (O'Kane) v. Steven C. Oimoen
this state.” No. 97-2692 3 Oimoen sought a de novo hearing in circuit court and, as indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13023 - 2017-09-21
this state.” No. 97-2692 3 Oimoen sought a de novo hearing in circuit court and, as indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13023 - 2017-09-21