Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14451 - 14460 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 14451 - 14460 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Cindy L. Grothe v. Valley Coatings, Inc.
appeals a judgment dismissing her negligence claim against Valley Coatings, Inc. Grothe argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2306 - 2005-03-31
appeals a judgment dismissing her negligence claim against Valley Coatings, Inc. Grothe argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2306 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 37
. The circuit court also pointed to the fact Kennedy had simultaneously claimed harm in some states from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=856925 - 2024-09-27
. The circuit court also pointed to the fact Kennedy had simultaneously claimed harm in some states from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=856925 - 2024-09-27
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by denying her ineffective assistance of counsel claim and her motion to withdraw her no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53821 - 2010-08-30
erred by denying her ineffective assistance of counsel claim and her motion to withdraw her no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53821 - 2010-08-30
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. McPhetridge
. No. 02-0263-CR 2 orders denying his postconviction motions. McPhetridge claims: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4890 - 2017-09-19
. No. 02-0263-CR 2 orders denying his postconviction motions. McPhetridge claims: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4890 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Terrance D. Prude
ineffective assistance of counsel claim for lack of prejudice. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 Prude was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25065 - 2017-09-21
ineffective assistance of counsel claim for lack of prejudice. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 Prude was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25065 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a postconviction motion asserting claims of plain error and ineffective assistance of counsel. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771390 - 2024-03-05
a postconviction motion asserting claims of plain error and ineffective assistance of counsel. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771390 - 2024-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed Malcolm Hatfield, M.D., violated the parties’ arbitration agreement. Dr. Hatfield appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32834 - 2008-06-03
claimed Malcolm Hatfield, M.D., violated the parties’ arbitration agreement. Dr. Hatfield appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32834 - 2008-06-03
[PDF]
William J. Faber v. Josephine W. Musser
and provides "back-up" coverage to a maximum of $300,000 per claim. § 646.31(4). 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17007 - 2017-09-21
and provides "back-up" coverage to a maximum of $300,000 per claim. § 646.31(4). 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17007 - 2017-09-21
State v. Marshall R. Reese
claims that: (1) the State destroyed exculpatory evidence; (2) his trial lawyer was ineffective; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
claims that: (1) the State destroyed exculpatory evidence; (2) his trial lawyer was ineffective; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
State v. Marshall R. Reese
for postconviction relief. Reese claims that: (1) the State destroyed exculpatory evidence; (2) his trial lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20870 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief. Reese claims that: (1) the State destroyed exculpatory evidence; (2) his trial lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20870 - 2017-09-21