Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14461 - 14470 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 14461 - 14470 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Village of Slinger v. City of Hartford
) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against the City of Hartford (City) for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4671 - 2017-09-19
) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against the City of Hartford (City) for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4671 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
of claim preclusion, and in concluding that her action was frivolous. We conclude that Antczak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
of claim preclusion, and in concluding that her action was frivolous. We conclude that Antczak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
argues that the trial court erred in concluding that her action was barred under the doctrine of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12682 - 2005-03-31
argues that the trial court erred in concluding that her action was barred under the doctrine of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12682 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissing her claims for unjust enrichment and conversion.[1] She argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41529 - 2009-09-28
dismissing her claims for unjust enrichment and conversion.[1] She argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41529 - 2009-09-28
Douglas Dietzen v. Diane Hardt
a notice of claim with the attorney general, as required by § 893.82(3), Stats.[1] The State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8124 - 2005-03-31
a notice of claim with the attorney general, as required by § 893.82(3), Stats.[1] The State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8124 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Slinger v. City of Hartford
) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against the City of Hartford (City) for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4579 - 2017-09-19
) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against the City of Hartford (City) for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4579 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ronald W. Morters v. Aiken & Scoptur
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing Morters’s claims against Aiken & Scoptur for legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21327 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing Morters’s claims against Aiken & Scoptur for legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21327 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment to the Town of Kinnickinnic on Ray’s declaratory judgment claim. Ray asked the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175055 - 2017-09-21
judgment to the Town of Kinnickinnic on Ray’s declaratory judgment claim. Ray asked the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175055 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
brought a postconviction motion claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33823 - 2014-09-15
brought a postconviction motion claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33823 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on a variety of grounds. The trial court denied the claims as untimely and procedurally barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21
on a variety of grounds. The trial court denied the claims as untimely and procedurally barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21