Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14461 - 14470 of 64735 for b's.
Search results 14461 - 14470 of 64735 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
to withhold unpaid rent from the security deposit. See Wis. Stat. § 704.28(1)(b). DISCUSSION ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108174 - 2014-02-18
to withhold unpaid rent from the security deposit. See Wis. Stat. § 704.28(1)(b). DISCUSSION ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108174 - 2014-02-18
State v. Michael C. Curran
for Dane County: Michael B. Torphy, Judge. Affirmed. ROGGENSACK, J. Michael C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11045 - 2005-03-31
for Dane County: Michael B. Torphy, Judge. Affirmed. ROGGENSACK, J. Michael C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11045 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN and THOMAS P. DONEGAN, Judges. Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41819 - 2014-09-15
for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN and THOMAS P. DONEGAN, Judges. Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41819 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lisa J. Poole v. David A. Poole
was not truly voluntary. DISCUSSION ¶7 David first argues that WIS. STAT. § 767.24(6)(b) (2001-02), 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5612 - 2017-09-19
was not truly voluntary. DISCUSSION ¶7 David first argues that WIS. STAT. § 767.24(6)(b) (2001-02), 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5612 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eva M. Bakken
concentration in excess of 0.1%, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Bakken contends that: (1) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8461 - 2005-03-31
concentration in excess of 0.1%, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Bakken contends that: (1) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sky B. Busk
-RESPONDENT, V. SKY B. BUSK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25036 - 2017-09-21
-RESPONDENT, V. SKY B. BUSK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25036 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
County Clerk of Circuit Court and Marjan Kmiec, d/b/a Kmiec Law Office, Defendants. Robin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121637 - 2014-09-16
County Clerk of Circuit Court and Marjan Kmiec, d/b/a Kmiec Law Office, Defendants. Robin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121637 - 2014-09-16
Mike Gruenberger v. Timothy Ziolkowski
Mike Gruenberger, d/b/a Mike the Plumber, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12004 - 2005-03-31
Mike Gruenberger, d/b/a Mike the Plumber, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12004 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Tammy Forbes, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clemens K. Stoeckl, d/b/a Stoeckl Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45943 - 2010-01-19
Tammy Forbes, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clemens K. Stoeckl, d/b/a Stoeckl Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45943 - 2010-01-19
State v. Thomas J. Trinko
that a first offense OWI is a traffic regulation matter under Wis. Stat. § 345.20(1)(b) and that we should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24600 - 2006-03-28
that a first offense OWI is a traffic regulation matter under Wis. Stat. § 345.20(1)(b) and that we should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24600 - 2006-03-28