Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14461 - 14470 of 29772 for des.
Search results 14461 - 14470 of 29772 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” or something to that effect. When Shade attempted to de-escalate the situation by standing between Norwood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106032 - 2017-09-21
,” or something to that effect. When Shade attempted to de-escalate the situation by standing between Norwood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106032 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tony Blackwell
court reiterated the de novo standard of reviewing the denial of a lesser-included instruction, see id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11878 - 2017-09-21
court reiterated the de novo standard of reviewing the denial of a lesser-included instruction, see id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11878 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223966 - 2018-10-25
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223966 - 2018-10-25
Joann R. Alwin v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis. 2d 598, 602, 587 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15787 - 2005-03-31
interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis. 2d 598, 602, 587 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15787 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d at 316 (citation omitted). ¶13 Hamilton contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74282 - 2011-11-22
of law, which we review de novo. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d at 316 (citation omitted). ¶13 Hamilton contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74282 - 2011-11-22
State v. Robert R. Orlebeke
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6697 - 2005-03-31
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6697 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Robert W. Burch, Jr.
that is reviewed de novo. See City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis.2d 856, 858, 505 N.W.2d 448, 449 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
that is reviewed de novo. See City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis.2d 856, 858, 505 N.W.2d 448, 449 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
these statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. Rutter v. Copper, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113843 - 2014-06-04
these statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. Rutter v. Copper, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113843 - 2014-06-04
Dorothy McGrane v. John O'Brien
judgment to O’Brien. Dorothy appeals. ¶10 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24800 - 2006-04-11
judgment to O’Brien. Dorothy appeals. ¶10 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24800 - 2006-04-11
State v. William E. Hall
to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31