Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14471 - 14480 of 19130 for citi.
Search results 14471 - 14480 of 19130 for citi.
State v. Joseph Williams
(Ct. App. 1995). At the motion to suppress the evidence, a City of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1995). At the motion to suppress the evidence, a City of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s use of its contempt powers for an erroneous exercise of discretion. City of Wis. Dells v. Dells
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174522 - 2017-09-21
court’s use of its contempt powers for an erroneous exercise of discretion. City of Wis. Dells v. Dells
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174522 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. This statutory clause is used interchangeably with the phrase “course of employment.” Weiss v. City of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
. This statutory clause is used interchangeably with the phrase “course of employment.” Weiss v. City of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
an altercation at a clothing store in the City of Milwaukee. When police arrived at the scene, they found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55089 - 2014-09-15
an altercation at a clothing store in the City of Milwaukee. When police arrived at the scene, they found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55089 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daryl G. Hoffmann
for use of their motor vehicles. See §§ 346.02(1) and 346.61, Stats.; see also City of Kenosha v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8054 - 2005-03-31
for use of their motor vehicles. See §§ 346.02(1) and 346.61, Stats.; see also City of Kenosha v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8054 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements of procedural due process are notice and an opportunity to be heard. City of S. Milwaukee v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104473 - 2013-11-18
requirements of procedural due process are notice and an opportunity to be heard. City of S. Milwaukee v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104473 - 2013-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of her vehicle.[1] We disagree and affirm. Background ¶2 Two city of Racine police officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121323 - 2014-09-09
of her vehicle.[1] We disagree and affirm. Background ¶2 Two city of Racine police officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121323 - 2014-09-09
[PDF]
State v. Terry L. Robertson
at the home of Robertson’s daughter and son-in-law when City of Milwaukee police officers arrived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2309 - 2017-09-19
at the home of Robertson’s daughter and son-in-law when City of Milwaukee police officers arrived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2309 - 2017-09-19
State v. Terrence Miller
and remand for further proceedings.[1] Officer Todd Johnson of the City of Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14785 - 2005-03-31
and remand for further proceedings.[1] Officer Todd Johnson of the City of Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14785 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
prior OWI convictions. City of La Crosse Police Officer Dale Gerbig testified that, while off duty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210584 - 2018-04-02
prior OWI convictions. City of La Crosse Police Officer Dale Gerbig testified that, while off duty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210584 - 2018-04-02