Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14471 - 14480 of 30175 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14471 - 14480 of 30175 for consulta de causas.
State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion whether a stop and search comported with the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion whether a stop and search comported with the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark H. Price
is termed the “objective test.” As its name implies, this test requires that we review the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
is termed the “objective test.” As its name implies, this test requires that we review the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26907 - 2014-09-15
. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26907 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Christ Groh
are a correct statement of the law is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14635 - 2017-09-21
are a correct statement of the law is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14635 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kevin Giffin v. Gary Poetzl
of the Town. Standard of Review ¶6 We review decisions on summary judgment de novo. U.S. Fid. & Guar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3088 - 2017-09-20
of the Town. Standard of Review ¶6 We review decisions on summary judgment de novo. U.S. Fid. & Guar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3088 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
The North Bay Co. v. Washburn County Zoning Committee
leaving only a question of law, which we decide de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10052 - 2017-09-19
leaving only a question of law, which we decide de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10052 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a discretionary or a de novo standard. No. 2021AP1014-CR 5 of custody does not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643508 - 2023-04-11
a discretionary or a de novo standard. No. 2021AP1014-CR 5 of custody does not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643508 - 2023-04-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
placement is warranted based on the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Walworth Cnty. v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136965 - 2017-09-21
placement is warranted based on the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Walworth Cnty. v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136965 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W.2d 369. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186561 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W.2d 369. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186561 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Glenn C. Kimpel
is a question of law, which we review de novo on appeal. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 525 N.W.2d 102
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16068 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we review de novo on appeal. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 525 N.W.2d 102
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16068 - 2017-09-21