Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14471 - 14480 of 29772 for des.
Search results 14471 - 14480 of 29772 for des.
State v. Gwen L.P.
legal standard governing termination of parental rights presents a question of law we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10488 - 2005-03-31
legal standard governing termination of parental rights presents a question of law we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10488 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of review: we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146730 - 2015-08-17
of review: we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146730 - 2015-08-17
State v. Douglas D.
. An appellate court is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions of law and must decide the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15718 - 2005-03-31
. An appellate court is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions of law and must decide the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15718 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
devoid of merit. Whether a party breached a contract is a legal issue we review de novo. Steele v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141299 - 2017-09-21
devoid of merit. Whether a party breached a contract is a legal issue we review de novo. Steele v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141299 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
of the doctrine of claim preclusion is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Kruckenberg v. Harvey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27042 - 2006-11-06
of the doctrine of claim preclusion is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Kruckenberg v. Harvey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27042 - 2006-11-06
State v. Jason M. Mulroy
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6594 - 2005-03-31
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6594 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54716 - 2010-09-22
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54716 - 2010-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
¶5 Summary judgments are reviewed de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32731 - 2008-05-19
¶5 Summary judgments are reviewed de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32731 - 2008-05-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G., 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55216 - 2014-09-15
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G., 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55216 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the [circuit] court applied the proper legal standard is a question of law we review de novo.” Ullerich v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391959 - 2021-07-20
the [circuit] court applied the proper legal standard is a question of law we review de novo.” Ullerich v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391959 - 2021-07-20