Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14471 - 14480 of 29704 for name.
Search results 14471 - 14480 of 29704 for name.
COURT OF APPEALS
is a forfeiture enforceable by an action in the name of the State. Wis. Stat. § 103.13(8) (“Any employer who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49311 - 2010-04-26
is a forfeiture enforceable by an action in the name of the State. Wis. Stat. § 103.13(8) (“Any employer who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49311 - 2010-04-26
Certification
. Plaintiffs named as defendants the District, the School Board and its officials, and K12 Inc., a Delaware
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
. Plaintiffs named as defendants the District, the School Board and its officials, and K12 Inc., a Delaware
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
[PDF]
State v. Pastori M. Balele
(1989); Lindas v. Cady, 150 Wis. 2d 421, 431, 441 N.W.2d 705 (1989). The attorneys named here were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4686 - 2017-09-19
(1989); Lindas v. Cady, 150 Wis. 2d 421, 431, 441 N.W.2d 705 (1989). The attorneys named here were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4686 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
forth in his supplemental no-merit report, namely, that Littel cannot demonstrate prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729715 - 2023-11-22
forth in his supplemental no-merit report, namely, that Littel cannot demonstrate prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729715 - 2023-11-22
[PDF]
State v. Jason Tyrrell
the lineup and some of them knew Tyrrell by name at the time. Tyrrell filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8908 - 2017-09-19
the lineup and some of them knew Tyrrell by name at the time. Tyrrell filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8908 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Ordinance (MGO) 38.10(1). Flowers filed this pro se action in his own name, petitioning for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92523 - 2013-02-06
Ordinance (MGO) 38.10(1). Flowers filed this pro se action in his own name, petitioning for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92523 - 2013-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that the information that Fisher contends counsel should have emphasized from the PSI—namely, Fisher’s purported reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92611 - 2013-02-06
that the information that Fisher contends counsel should have emphasized from the PSI—namely, Fisher’s purported reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92611 - 2013-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
two years later, Newson moved for sentence modification, contending that a new factor, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47252 - 2010-02-22
two years later, Newson moved for sentence modification, contending that a new factor, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47252 - 2010-02-22
CA Blank Order
testimony—namely, that Jones caused substantial battery to the victim, that he intended to cause bodily harm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105380 - 2013-12-05
testimony—namely, that Jones caused substantial battery to the victim, that he intended to cause bodily harm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105380 - 2013-12-05
CA Blank Order
conduct, namely, sexual intercourse with a child. The facts of record coupled with the court’s stated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121322 - 2014-09-09
conduct, namely, sexual intercourse with a child. The facts of record coupled with the court’s stated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121322 - 2014-09-09