Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14471 - 14480 of 75273 for public records.

[PDF] State v. Bobby P.
in relevant part: All records relating to a child which are relevant to the subject matter of a proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8647 - 2017-09-19

State v. Bobby P.
under ยง 48.293(2), Stats., which provides in relevant part: All records relating to a child which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8647 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
on CCAP you can find out about any public court record, then they may be presuming criminal, they may
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671385 - 2023-06-23

COURT OF APPEALS
Cesar was found ineligible for public defender representation, but the trial court appointed a lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87403 - 2012-09-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 2013. The Montesanos have not argued, and we have not found anywhere in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112361 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
by omission. Instead, the damage limitation may only be expressly waived by a public entity
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16940 - 2017-09-21

Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
by omission. Instead, the damage limitation may only be expressly waived by a public entity in situations
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16908 - 2005-03-31

Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
by omission. Instead, the damage limitation may only be expressly waived by a public entity in situations
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16940 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
by omission. Instead, the damage limitation may only be expressly waived by a public entity
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16908 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 2023AP001412 - Petitioners' Response to Motion to Recuse
. ........................................................................................... 14 B. The Record Does Not Establish Partiality. ............................... 15 CONCLUSION
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1412_0822petitionersresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16