Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14481 - 14490 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 14481 - 14490 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed her claim. The circuit court determined that Gladney needed an expert witness to support her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
and dismissed her claim. The circuit court determined that Gladney needed an expert witness to support her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
Ronald W. Morters v. Aiken & Scoptur
In the aforereferenced decision, we affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing Morters’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21327 - 2006-03-22
In the aforereferenced decision, we affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing Morters’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21327 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment, and he argued that Reiman’s claims failed in their entirety because Reiman could not prove two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878298 - 2024-11-19
judgment, and he argued that Reiman’s claims failed in their entirety because Reiman could not prove two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878298 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
of claim preclusion, and in concluding that her action was frivolous. We conclude that Antczak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
of claim preclusion, and in concluding that her action was frivolous. We conclude that Antczak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Village of Slinger v. City of Hartford
) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against the City of Hartford (City) for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4671 - 2017-09-19
) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against the City of Hartford (City) for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4671 - 2017-09-19
Douglas Dietzen v. Diane Hardt
a notice of claim with the attorney general, as required by § 893.82(3), Stats.[1] The State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8124 - 2008-05-14
a notice of claim with the attorney general, as required by § 893.82(3), Stats.[1] The State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8124 - 2008-05-14
[PDF]
Response to the Wisconsin Legislature's Motion for Stay (Hunter)
claim that this Court is guilty of racial gerrymandering. The Legislature’s claims are without merit
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/hunter_mst.pdf - 2022-03-09
claim that this Court is guilty of racial gerrymandering. The Legislature’s claims are without merit
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/hunter_mst.pdf - 2022-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this matter as the circuit court. No. 2022AP1610-CR 3 This court rejected his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786480 - 2024-04-09
in this matter as the circuit court. No. 2022AP1610-CR 3 This court rejected his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786480 - 2024-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
relief raising numerous claims regarding the fact that he was required to wear a stun belt at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141618 - 2015-05-11
relief raising numerous claims regarding the fact that he was required to wear a stun belt at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141618 - 2015-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
of three of the appellant’s claims. Here the circuit court dismissed all but one cause of action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28675 - 2007-07-11
of three of the appellant’s claims. Here the circuit court dismissed all but one cause of action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28675 - 2007-07-11