Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14481 - 14490 of 17550 for ex.

State v. Stanley L. Felton
that Felton is not procedurally barred from raising these issues, see State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18455 - 2005-06-06

State v. Demetrius R. Powell
court held a Miranda-Goodchild hearing. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966); State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5833 - 2005-03-31

State v. Benjamin J. Barney
, 519-26 (1971), and State ex rel. Plotkin v. DHSS, 63 Wis.2d 535, 541-45, 217 N.W.2d 641, 644-46 (1974
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11682 - 2005-03-31

Heritage Bank & Trust v. Duane Dietsche
exercised its discretion. See State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H., 122 Wis.2d 536, 541, 363 N.W.2d 419, 422
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11882 - 2005-03-31

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
Court?s 2005 decision in Thomas ex rel. Gramling v. Mallett may be applied in other cases. Some
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=72&year=2008

City of Sun Prairie v. William D. Davis
the principle that inherent powers are only those which are necessary is found in State ex rel. Friedrich v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12588 - 2005-03-31

WI App 94 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2539-CR Complete Tit...
question. ¶8 We rely on the basic statutory interpretation principles set forth in State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120415 - 2014-09-23

State v. Roger P. VanderLogt
corpus filed in the trial court. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis.2d 675, 681, 556 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11111 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the statute. If the meaning of the statute is plain, we ordinarily stop the inquiry.’” State ex rel. Kalal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995770 - 2025-08-21

2007 WI APP 112
-26, 244 Wis. 2d 777, 629 N.W.2d 601; Delaware ex rel. Buckson v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 244 A.2d 80
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28426 - 2007-04-26