Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14491 - 14500 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.

COURT OF APPEALS
Thomas raised an additional issue, claiming Bryant-Nanz was ineffective for failing to file a Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24

State v. Eddie J. Shumaker
motion. Shumaker claims that: (1) his sentence was excessive;[1] (2) he did not knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8575 - 2005-03-31

Erland Anderson v. Dale Peterson
summary judgment on the misrepresentation claims because the representations constituted Anderson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14608 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher Butler
by denying his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and selective prosecution without holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2972 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph Schultz
the State’s nuisance claim because lack of knowledge was irrelevant under his understanding of then existing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14463 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher Butler
by denying his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and selective prosecution without holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2973 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher Butler
by denying his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and selective prosecution without holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2974 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kenneth L. Grover v.
on a third-party claim brought in connection with the injury. In March, 1989, Attorney Grover wrote
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16983 - 2017-09-21

Rebecca Lunde-Ross v. Federated Insurance Company
. BROWN, J. In July 1995, Rebecca Lunde-Ross[1] filed a claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11248 - 2005-03-31

Patricia A. Leider v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
opinion on the merits of Leider's pending compensation claim, we affirm the circuit court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8183 - 2005-03-31