Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14491 - 14500 of 30154 for consulta de causas.

State v. Jason S. Petri
this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶9 Petri argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14748 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the issue now to obtain a new trial. We review the question of forfeiture de novo. State v. Counihan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089380 - 2026-03-12

State v. Darrell C. Solfest
of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review will apply as statutory construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12201 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of misrepresentation is a question of law we review de novo. Loula v. Snap-On Tools Corp., 175 Wis. 2d 50, 54, 498 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143063 - 2015-06-16

Connie M. Metzler v. William Dichraff
court's grant of summary judgment is de novo, but is based on the summary judgment materials properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11843 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
pass constitutional muster is a question of law we review de novo.” Oswald, 232 Wis. 2d 103, ¶42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29903 - 2007-08-06

State v. Christ Groh
statement of the law is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis.2d 687, 699
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14635 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Ibid. A defendant who seeks resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79392 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
,” or something to that effect. When Shade attempted to de-escalate the situation by standing between Norwood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106032 - 2017-09-21

City of Wautoma v. Richard A. Wehe
probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15050 - 2005-03-31