Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14491 - 14500 of 30177 for de.
Search results 14491 - 14500 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15523 - 2017-09-21
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 233 (Ct. App. 1994) (“construction of a statute presents a question of law, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101565 - 2017-09-21
.2d 233 (Ct. App. 1994) (“construction of a statute presents a question of law, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101565 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204073 - 2017-11-30
is a question of law, which we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204073 - 2017-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d 219, 236-37, 548 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99032 - 2014-09-15
the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d 219, 236-37, 548 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99032 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197490 - 2017-10-10
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197490 - 2017-10-10
COURT OF APPEALS
to the factual findings de novo. See Casarez, 314 Wis. 2d 661, ¶9. ¶6 The principles of law governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
to the factual findings de novo. See Casarez, 314 Wis. 2d 661, ¶9. ¶6 The principles of law governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS
or evidence. Nimmer appeals. Discussion ¶9 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34316 - 2008-10-14
or evidence. Nimmer appeals. Discussion ¶9 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34316 - 2008-10-14
State v. Jeffrey Sailing
any of the factual findings made by the trial court, we review de novo the question of law: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11936 - 2005-03-31
any of the factual findings made by the trial court, we review de novo the question of law: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11936 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
they were denied the opportunity to submit arguments to the court. Moreover, we review de novo whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
they were denied the opportunity to submit arguments to the court. Moreover, we review de novo whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31308 - 2007-12-26
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31308 - 2007-12-26