Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14491 - 14500 of 30177 for de.
Search results 14491 - 14500 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
State v. Craig P. Helgeland
N.W.2d 525, 528 (Ct. App. 1990). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12415 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 525, 528 (Ct. App. 1990). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12415 - 2005-03-31
Ericka Clark v. Devin R. Mudge, M.D.
discretionary determination involving a question of law, we review the question of law de novo and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14980 - 2005-03-31
discretionary determination involving a question of law, we review the question of law de novo and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14980 - 2005-03-31
Dana J. Mignognia v. Salvatore Mignognia
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christ Groh
statement of the law is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis.2d 687, 699
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14635 - 2005-03-31
statement of the law is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis.2d 687, 699
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14635 - 2005-03-31
State v. Heather C.P.
. This court will interpret the requirements of §§ 48.30 and 48.315, Stats., de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12049 - 2005-03-31
. This court will interpret the requirements of §§ 48.30 and 48.315, Stats., de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12049 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Lentz’s accounts of Cooper’s consent were de minimis. The court found that the two officers described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60990 - 2011-03-14
and Lentz’s accounts of Cooper’s consent were de minimis. The court found that the two officers described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60990 - 2011-03-14
State v. Michael L., Jr.
a restitution order comports with the statute is, however, subject to our de novo review. State v. Canady, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5302 - 2005-03-31
a restitution order comports with the statute is, however, subject to our de novo review. State v. Canady, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5302 - 2005-03-31
Sheboygan County v. Michele L.W.
that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3178 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3178 - 2005-03-31
Kerry Inc. v. Econo Equipment, Inc.
of Review. ¶4 The interpretation of a contract is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3198 - 2005-03-31
of Review. ¶4 The interpretation of a contract is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3198 - 2005-03-31