Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14491 - 14500 of 65305 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 14491 - 14500 of 65305 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Robert W. Miller
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing transcript or otherwise have a full understanding of the entire record. We affirm. ¶2 In 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426094 - 2021-09-16
sentencing transcript or otherwise have a full understanding of the entire record. We affirm. ¶2 In 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426094 - 2021-09-16
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
an error of fact in its record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6651 - 2017-09-20
an error of fact in its record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6651 - 2017-09-20
VIP Construction, Inc. v. Rajko Andeljkovic
claim deed containing this restriction is of record in the office of the Racine County Register of Deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6620 - 2005-03-31
claim deed containing this restriction is of record in the office of the Racine County Register of Deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6620 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Nos. 2013AP2567-CRNM 2013AP2568
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167395 - 2017-09-21
of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Nos. 2013AP2567-CRNM 2013AP2568
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167395 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert W. Miller
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2370 - 2005-03-31
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2370 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Petty’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248933 - 2019-10-23
report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Petty’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248933 - 2019-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812047 - 2024-06-11
, but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812047 - 2024-06-11
CA Blank Order
sanctions against him. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114000 - 2014-06-04
sanctions against him. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114000 - 2014-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
court reasonably considered the facts of record under the proper legal standard. See Nelson v. Taff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46065 - 2010-01-20
court reasonably considered the facts of record under the proper legal standard. See Nelson v. Taff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46065 - 2010-01-20