Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1451 - 1460 of 6482 for dr.
Search results 1451 - 1460 of 6482 for dr.
[PDF]
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
that Farrey was “stalking” him and Dr. David Fingard because Cathy Ptak, an employee of St. Luke's, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9076 - 2017-09-19
that Farrey was “stalking” him and Dr. David Fingard because Cathy Ptak, an employee of St. Luke's, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9076 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 ¶4 Dr. Charles Rainey, a forensic psychiatrist appointed by the circuit court to evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252355 - 2020-01-14
3 ¶4 Dr. Charles Rainey, a forensic psychiatrist appointed by the circuit court to evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252355 - 2020-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the parties). No. 2017AP2163-CR 5 ¶9 Doe next argues that there is a new factor because Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246156 - 2019-08-30
of the parties). No. 2017AP2163-CR 5 ¶9 Doe next argues that there is a new factor because Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246156 - 2019-08-30
[PDF]
American Motors Corporation v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
1988, he was examined by Dr. Jose Kanshepolsky. After EMG and nerve conduction studies were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8060 - 2017-09-19
1988, he was examined by Dr. Jose Kanshepolsky. After EMG and nerve conduction studies were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8060 - 2017-09-19
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
and Dr. David Fingard because Cathy Ptak, an employee of St. Luke's, where Gonnering treated Farrey, told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9557 - 2005-03-31
and Dr. David Fingard because Cathy Ptak, an employee of St. Luke's, where Gonnering treated Farrey, told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9557 - 2005-03-31
David J. Winkel v. Jeanette M. Wilke
the address recited on the enclosed notice. The notices recited the Capitol Dr. address recited in Winkel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
the address recited on the enclosed notice. The notices recited the Capitol Dr. address recited in Winkel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
and Dr. David Fingard because Cathy Ptak, an employee of St. Luke's, where Gonnering treated Farrey, told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9076 - 2005-03-31
and Dr. David Fingard because Cathy Ptak, an employee of St. Luke's, where Gonnering treated Farrey, told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9076 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
psychiatrist, Dr. Filza Hussain, testified consistent with the report she submitted prior to trial. Dr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175683 - 2017-09-21
psychiatrist, Dr. Filza Hussain, testified consistent with the report she submitted prior to trial. Dr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
that Farrey was “stalking” him and Dr. David Fingard because Cathy Ptak, an employee of St. Luke's, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9557 - 2017-09-19
that Farrey was “stalking” him and Dr. David Fingard because Cathy Ptak, an employee of St. Luke's, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9557 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Christopher J. Klingeisen
from Klingeisen, the circuit court noted that Dr. Charles Lodl, a defense psychologist, had opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4906 - 2017-09-19
from Klingeisen, the circuit court noted that Dr. Charles Lodl, a defense psychologist, had opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4906 - 2017-09-19