Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1451 - 1460 of 5316 for text.
Search results 1451 - 1460 of 5316 for text.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
8 On appeal, Adams’s contentions appear to relate to records of phone calls, and not text
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013916 - 2025-09-24
8 On appeal, Adams’s contentions appear to relate to records of phone calls, and not text
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013916 - 2025-09-24
[PDF]
WI App 69
in the court of appeals Teschendorf opinion, to acknowledge that the text of the statute does not state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432144 - 2021-11-16
in the court of appeals Teschendorf opinion, to acknowledge that the text of the statute does not state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432144 - 2021-11-16
Janice L. Edwards v. Jeffery A. Edwards
but is worded identically to § 767.255(3)(L), Stats., 1995-96. [3] The text of the Norman stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13824 - 2005-03-31
but is worded identically to § 767.255(3)(L), Stats., 1995-96. [3] The text of the Norman stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13824 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 107 (2012). This rule is context- driven for sure, but it is common sense as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244124 - 2019-07-24
: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 107 (2012). This rule is context- driven for sure, but it is common sense as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244124 - 2019-07-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
as they are ascertainable from the text and structure of the statute itself. See id., ¶48. If, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34738 - 2014-09-15
as they are ascertainable from the text and structure of the statute itself. See id., ¶48. If, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). We first determine whether the meaning of the statute is plain, and in doing so examine the text
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164258 - 2017-09-21
). We first determine whether the meaning of the statute is plain, and in doing so examine the text
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164258 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 68
words to the statute’s text. Words excluded from a statutory text must be presumed to have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195990 - 2018-08-23
words to the statute’s text. Words excluded from a statutory text must be presumed to have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195990 - 2018-08-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
begins with the text of the statute; we give the text its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28962 - 2014-09-15
begins with the text of the statute; we give the text its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28962 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy J. Johnson
in isolation, but as part of a larger text, and in relation to the language of surrounding or closely related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19295 - 2005-09-19
in isolation, but as part of a larger text, and in relation to the language of surrounding or closely related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19295 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
Janice L. Edwards v. Jeffery A. Edwards
, 3 The text of the Norman stipulation is not set forth in our opinion in that case. We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13824 - 2014-09-15
, 3 The text of the Norman stipulation is not set forth in our opinion in that case. We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13824 - 2014-09-15