Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14501 - 14510 of 30177 for de.
Search results 14501 - 14510 of 30177 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39904 - 2009-08-25
, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39904 - 2009-08-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Kristiansen appeals. Discussion ¶7 Our review of a circuit court’s decision on summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576895 - 2022-10-12
. Kristiansen appeals. Discussion ¶7 Our review of a circuit court’s decision on summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576895 - 2022-10-12
[PDF]
WI App 130
of his ten-month battery sentence. This is a statutory construction question that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70096 - 2014-09-15
of his ten-month battery sentence. This is a statutory construction question that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70096 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.2d 414. Such review is not de novo. See id. On appeal to this court, we apply the same standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208821 - 2018-02-21
.2d 414. Such review is not de novo. See id. On appeal to this court, we apply the same standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208821 - 2018-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. ¶5 We conclude that Copeland is not entitled to suppression of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98391 - 2014-09-15
de novo. Id. ¶5 We conclude that Copeland is not entitled to suppression of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98391 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (footnote omitted; citation omitted). “We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174763 - 2017-09-21
) (footnote omitted; citation omitted). “We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174763 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jennie K. Vasen v. Progressive Insurance Companies
filed suit. ¶6 We review a summary judgment order de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16166 - 2017-09-21
filed suit. ¶6 We review a summary judgment order de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16166 - 2017-09-21
City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
of both counts. He appealed to the circuit court for a trial de novo. After a jury trial in circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15158 - 2005-03-31
of both counts. He appealed to the circuit court for a trial de novo. After a jury trial in circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15158 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darrell J. Shearer
), but whether those facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3739 - 2005-03-31
), but whether those facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3739 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shermell G. Tabor
is disputed. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v. Swiams, 2004 WI App 217, ¶5, 277 Wis. 2d 400, 404
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17874 - 2005-06-12
is disputed. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v. Swiams, 2004 WI App 217, ¶5, 277 Wis. 2d 400, 404
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17874 - 2005-06-12