Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14501 - 14510 of 34005 for dismissal.
Search results 14501 - 14510 of 34005 for dismissal.
[PDF]
William Gill v. City and Common Council of Oconomowoc
the respondents’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the appellants’ action. The appellants argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18858 - 2017-09-21
the respondents’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the appellants’ action. The appellants argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18858 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey G. Henschel
of § 345.24, Stats. In a pretrial motion, Henschel sought dismissal of the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12424 - 2005-03-31
of § 345.24, Stats. In a pretrial motion, Henschel sought dismissal of the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12424 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
be vacated and the charge dismissed. He also claims that the sentencing court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07
be vacated and the charge dismissed. He also claims that the sentencing court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing, the State dismissed the habitual criminality penalty enhancer before Mathis entered his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841119 - 2024-08-27
hearing, the State dismissed the habitual criminality penalty enhancer before Mathis entered his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841119 - 2024-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
The State agreed to recommend a seventeen-year term of imprisonment and to move for dismissal of the armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238211 - 2019-03-26
The State agreed to recommend a seventeen-year term of imprisonment and to move for dismissal of the armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238211 - 2019-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
unfit. The failure-to-assume ground was dismissed. The matters proceeded to a dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994702 - 2025-08-12
unfit. The failure-to-assume ground was dismissed. The matters proceeded to a dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994702 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
buys. Batcher pled guilty to six counts and the remaining six counts were dismissed as read-ins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260793 - 2020-05-19
buys. Batcher pled guilty to six counts and the remaining six counts were dismissed as read-ins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260793 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
Engelking Corporation v. Village of Superior
Corporation, pro se, appeals a summary judgment order dismissing its case against the Village of Superior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7621 - 2017-09-19
Corporation, pro se, appeals a summary judgment order dismissing its case against the Village of Superior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7621 - 2017-09-19
Karen E. Setunsky v. John C. Gallagher, M.D.
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Karen and Todd Setunsky appeal a summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3476 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Karen and Todd Setunsky appeal a summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3476 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). K & D Realty, LLC (K & D) appeals an order dismissing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687552 - 2023-08-09
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). K & D Realty, LLC (K & D) appeals an order dismissing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687552 - 2023-08-09