Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14501 - 14510 of 58499 for speedy trial.
Search results 14501 - 14510 of 58499 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
was denied the right to an impartial jury; (2) the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony about why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34037 - 2008-09-15
was denied the right to an impartial jury; (2) the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony about why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34037 - 2008-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BRASH, C.J.1 S.T. appeals the orders of the trial court terminating her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445604 - 2021-10-26
, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BRASH, C.J.1 S.T. appeals the orders of the trial court terminating her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445604 - 2021-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
allegations, including the persistent repeater allegation. The trial court sentenced Pryor to ten years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26845 - 2006-10-18
allegations, including the persistent repeater allegation. The trial court sentenced Pryor to ten years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26845 - 2006-10-18
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that a new trial should be ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79456 - 2012-03-13
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that a new trial should be ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79456 - 2012-03-13
[PDF]
State v. Rakhoda Amani Beni
interpreter, as required by WIS. STAT. § 885.38 (2003-04); 2 that the trial court abused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18451 - 2017-09-21
interpreter, as required by WIS. STAT. § 885.38 (2003-04); 2 that the trial court abused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18451 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
face to the fire.” ¶7 The State filed a pre-trial motion to admit A.L.D.’s 911 call and on- scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
face to the fire.” ¶7 The State filed a pre-trial motion to admit A.L.D.’s 911 call and on- scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that Buske forfeited the right to raise this issue by failing to make a post-trial motion asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84177 - 2012-06-27
that Buske forfeited the right to raise this issue by failing to make a post-trial motion asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84177 - 2012-06-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
se from a forfeiture judgment after the trial court found her guilty of speeding. As best we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32205 - 2014-09-15
se from a forfeiture judgment after the trial court found her guilty of speeding. As best we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32205 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, the trial court erred when it permitted her attorney to be excused from the dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30382 - 2007-10-10
, the trial court erred when it permitted her attorney to be excused from the dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30382 - 2007-10-10
[PDF]
WI APP 53
claim, faulting his trial counsel for not objecting to the meaning given to the jury by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48499 - 2014-09-15
claim, faulting his trial counsel for not objecting to the meaning given to the jury by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48499 - 2014-09-15