Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14521 - 14530 of 65007 for or b.
Search results 14521 - 14530 of 65007 for or b.
[PDF]
Timothy Cepukenas v. Shelli L. Cepukenas
jurisdiction, the court may modify the order. See § 769.611(1)(b), STATS.1 No written consent has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12662 - 2017-09-21
jurisdiction, the court may modify the order. See § 769.611(1)(b), STATS.1 No written consent has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12662 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, attempt or threat to do serious physical harm.” WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a)2.b. 4 The “fifth standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251805 - 2020-01-02
, attempt or threat to do serious physical harm.” WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a)2.b. 4 The “fifth standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251805 - 2020-01-02
Timothy Cepukenas v. Shelli L. Cepukenas
modify the order. See § 769.611(1)(b), Stats.1 No written consent has been filed in the case at bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12662 - 2005-03-31
modify the order. See § 769.611(1)(b), Stats.1 No written consent has been filed in the case at bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12662 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald Miller
and 901.03(1)(b), Stats. Finally, Miller argues that the trial court misapplied the rape shield law, § 972.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14993 - 2005-03-31
and 901.03(1)(b), Stats. Finally, Miller argues that the trial court misapplied the rape shield law, § 972.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14993 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). 3 WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.015(1)(a) provides, in pertinent part: Subject to par. (b) and except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86046 - 2014-09-15
). 3 WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.015(1)(a) provides, in pertinent part: Subject to par. (b) and except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86046 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
La Crosse County Human Services Department v. Elizabeth A.J.
or more court orders …. (b) 1. In this paragraph, “diligent effort” means an earnest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12591 - 2017-09-21
or more court orders …. (b) 1. In this paragraph, “diligent effort” means an earnest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12591 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Wheat, 2002 WI App 153, ¶14, 256 Wis. 2d 270, 647 N.W.2d 441. B. Vindictive Prosecution ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89383 - 2013-05-20
. Wheat, 2002 WI App 153, ¶14, 256 Wis. 2d 270, 647 N.W.2d 441. B. Vindictive Prosecution ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89383 - 2013-05-20
State v. Jovan T. Mull
endangered three victims, three charges and multiple punishments were constitutionally sound. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4632 - 2005-03-31
endangered three victims, three charges and multiple punishments were constitutionally sound. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4632 - 2005-03-31
Lee A. Knowlin v. David H. Schwarz
in Wis. Stat. § 302.335(2)(b) beyond ten days. Specifically, he contends that the Division lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3600 - 2005-03-31
in Wis. Stat. § 302.335(2)(b) beyond ten days. Specifically, he contends that the Division lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Harrold J. McComas v. Loren Tallmadge
or in the future; (b) In the case of a beneficiary under a discretionary trust, order the trustee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13099 - 2017-09-21
or in the future; (b) In the case of a beneficiary under a discretionary trust, order the trustee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13099 - 2017-09-21