Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14531 - 14540 of 91986 for 1.
Search results 14531 - 14540 of 91986 for 1.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Meera and Basheal Agrawal appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45341 - 2010-01-06
. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Meera and Basheal Agrawal appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45341 - 2010-01-06
Barron County v. Vicki L. Buchner
of the circuit court for Barron County: JAMES C. EATON, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] Vicki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4542 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Barron County: JAMES C. EATON, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] Vicki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4542 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James D. Luedtke v. David H. Schwarz
are: (1) whether Luedtke had passed his mandatory release date and should have been released outright
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10070 - 2017-09-19
are: (1) whether Luedtke had passed his mandatory release date and should have been released outright
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10070 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tracy L. Singleton
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Tracy L. Singleton appeals pro se from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26300 - 2017-09-21
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Tracy L. Singleton appeals pro se from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26300 - 2017-09-21
James D. Luedtke v. David H. Schwarz
. The issues are: (1) whether Luedtke had passed his mandatory release date and should have been released
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
. The issues are: (1) whether Luedtke had passed his mandatory release date and should have been released
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
F. O’MELIA, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J.[1] Nicole W.’s parental rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35966 - 2009-03-22
F. O’MELIA, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J.[1] Nicole W.’s parental rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35966 - 2009-03-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., Neubauer, P.J., and Reilly, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Andrew Cephus appeals from a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74632 - 2014-09-15
., Neubauer, P.J., and Reilly, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Andrew Cephus appeals from a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74632 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 GROGAN, J.1 Joel Villareal, pro se, appeals from an order denying his request to re-open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590174 - 2022-11-16
. ¶1 GROGAN, J.1 Joel Villareal, pro se, appeals from an order denying his request to re-open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590174 - 2022-11-16
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Emerson
and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5634 - 2017-09-19
and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5634 - 2017-09-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
reinstatement proceeding. Reinstatement granted upon conditions. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18712 - 2005-06-23
reinstatement proceeding. Reinstatement granted upon conditions. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18712 - 2005-06-23