Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14531 - 14540 of 30072 for de.
Search results 14531 - 14540 of 30072 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
which we review de novo. See Estate of Hegarty ex rel. Hegarty v. Beauchaine, 2001 WI App 300, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431915 - 2021-09-28
which we review de novo. See Estate of Hegarty ex rel. Hegarty v. Beauchaine, 2001 WI App 300, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431915 - 2021-09-28
[PDF]
WI App 30
§ 939.74. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. See West v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240942 - 2019-07-09
§ 939.74. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. See West v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240942 - 2019-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reason for failing to raise an available claim earlier is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
reason for failing to raise an available claim earlier is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181878 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181878 - 2017-09-21
Matthew M. v. Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services
)(a). ¶7 Whether a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5743 - 2005-03-31
)(a). ¶7 Whether a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. Mikrut, 273 Wis. 2d 76, ¶7. The State asserts that Cotton forfeited his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
that this court reviews de novo. Mikrut, 273 Wis. 2d 76, ¶7. The State asserts that Cotton forfeited his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
Village of Elm Grove v. Tina Fleming
constitutes probable cause is a question of law that the court of appeals will review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5138 - 2005-03-31
constitutes probable cause is a question of law that the court of appeals will review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5138 - 2005-03-31
David J. Gehl v. Peter Conrad
, when the exercise of that discretion involves a question of law, we review the question de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26120 - 2006-08-09
, when the exercise of that discretion involves a question of law, we review the question de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26120 - 2006-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 233 (Ct. App. 1994) (“construction of a statute presents a question of law, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101565 - 2013-09-03
.2d 233 (Ct. App. 1994) (“construction of a statute presents a question of law, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101565 - 2013-09-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
available claims earlier is a question of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218915 - 2018-09-19
available claims earlier is a question of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218915 - 2018-09-19