Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14531 - 14540 of 63531 for records/1000.
Search results 14531 - 14540 of 63531 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Statutes are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2021AP46-CRNM 2 record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490282 - 2022-03-03
Statutes are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2021AP46-CRNM 2 record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490282 - 2022-03-03
Xiaoxia Yu v. Jiayou Zhang
exercise of discretion to modify maintenance so long as the record shows the trial court rationally applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15805 - 2005-03-31
exercise of discretion to modify maintenance so long as the record shows the trial court rationally applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15805 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
). The no-merit review in the mother’s appeal was based on the record shared with Richard’s appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93281 - 2014-09-15
). The no-merit review in the mother’s appeal was based on the record shared with Richard’s appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93281 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the presentence investigation report, however, the record refutes Madden’s assertions. ¶5 During Madden’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33114 - 2008-06-23
of the presentence investigation report, however, the record refutes Madden’s assertions. ¶5 During Madden’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33114 - 2008-06-23
State v. Rocky J. Shaw
because nothing in the record indicated that the children heard the second conversation or were capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11135 - 2005-03-31
because nothing in the record indicated that the children heard the second conversation or were capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a response, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91979 - 2014-09-15
a response, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91979 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tina H.
that the department made a diligent effort to provide the services ordered by the court. The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13017 - 2017-09-21
that the department made a diligent effort to provide the services ordered by the court. The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150614 - 2017-09-21
the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150614 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to file a response, and he has responded. After reviewing the record, counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
was advised of his right to file a response, and he has responded. After reviewing the record, counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
COURT OF APPEALS
and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. “The primary considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19
and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. “The primary considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19