Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14541 - 14550 of 30177 for de.
Search results 14541 - 14550 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶10 Personal jurisdiction under Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559116 - 2022-08-30
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶10 Personal jurisdiction under Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559116 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court authority to correct the sentence. We review this question of law de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267924 - 2020-07-09
court authority to correct the sentence. We review this question of law de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267924 - 2020-07-09
[PDF]
William B. Diel v. State of Wisconsin-Labor and Industry Review Commission
N.W.2d 222 (1978). We do not assess the facts de novo, as Diel would have us do. ¶10 Diel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2780 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 222 (1978). We do not assess the facts de novo, as Diel would have us do. ¶10 Diel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2780 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law” this court reviews de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798443 - 2024-05-08
is a question of law” this court reviews de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798443 - 2024-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissal is not at issue on appeal. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31936 - 2008-02-25
dismissal is not at issue on appeal. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31936 - 2008-02-25
State v. Arthur B. Patton
a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31
a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court. Frost v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131889 - 2014-12-17
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court. Frost v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131889 - 2014-12-17
John Smith v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14702 - 2005-03-31
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14702 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
retained competency, is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
retained competency, is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
2006 WI APP 260
, which we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26674 - 2006-12-19
, which we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26674 - 2006-12-19