Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14541 - 14550 of 30072 for de.
Search results 14541 - 14550 of 30072 for de.
Frankie Kirk Rottier v. John Edward Walsh
, 636, 586 N.W.2d 863, 866 (1998). And we review an unambiguous document de novo. See Micro-Managers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14977 - 2005-03-31
, 636, 586 N.W.2d 863, 866 (1998). And we review an unambiguous document de novo. See Micro-Managers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14977 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2008-06-16
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2008-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (footnote omitted; citation omitted). “We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174763 - 2017-09-21
) (footnote omitted; citation omitted). “We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174763 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196881 - 2017-09-21
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196881 - 2017-09-21
County of Dunn v. Joseph W. Uetz
. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value the circuit court's opinion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5130 - 2005-03-31
. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value the circuit court's opinion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5130 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of misrepresentation is a question of law we review de novo. Loula v. Snap-On Tools Corp., 175 Wis. 2d 50, 54, 498 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143063 - 2015-06-16
of misrepresentation is a question of law we review de novo. Loula v. Snap-On Tools Corp., 175 Wis. 2d 50, 54, 498 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143063 - 2015-06-16
State v. Bentura Martinez
of identification procedures raises an issue of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilson, 179 Wis.2d 660, 682
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9312 - 2005-03-31
of identification procedures raises an issue of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilson, 179 Wis.2d 660, 682
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9312 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl H. Zahn
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 230-31, 501 N.W.2d at 878
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9093 - 2009-08-09
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 230-31, 501 N.W.2d at 878
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9093 - 2009-08-09
State v. Mareese Anderson
(1989). Whether a “new factor” exists is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11809 - 2005-03-31
(1989). Whether a “new factor” exists is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11809 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Marcellus Johnson
factor is a question of law which we decide de novo. See id. at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2010-06-30
factor is a question of law which we decide de novo. See id. at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2010-06-30