Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14541 - 14550 of 30185 for de.
Search results 14541 - 14550 of 30185 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Ibid. A defendant who seeks resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79392 - 2014-09-15
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Ibid. A defendant who seeks resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79392 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Andres Godina
). Whether a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13092 - 2017-09-21
). Whether a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
The Equitable Bank v. Charles Chabron
statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See Weber v. Weber, 176 Wis. 2d 1085
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16088 - 2017-09-21
statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See Weber v. Weber, 176 Wis. 2d 1085
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16088 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Glenn C. Kimpel
is a question of law, which we review de novo on appeal. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 525 N.W.2d 102
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16068 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we review de novo on appeal. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 525 N.W.2d 102
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16068 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David R. Messner
99-2116-CR 3 a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15553 - 2017-09-21
99-2116-CR 3 a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15553 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brandon J. Green
great deference to the magistrate’s decision, rather than reviewing the matter de novo. See id. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15511 - 2017-09-21
great deference to the magistrate’s decision, rather than reviewing the matter de novo. See id. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15511 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
statutes to a set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88073 - 2012-10-10
statutes to a set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88073 - 2012-10-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the procedural bar is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475915 - 2022-01-25
the procedural bar is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475915 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
State v. David Allen Bruski
facts against the constitutional standard de novo. Id. ¶12 When we assess a defendant’s standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21227 - 2017-09-21
facts against the constitutional standard de novo. Id. ¶12 When we assess a defendant’s standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21227 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” or something to that effect. When Shade attempted to de-escalate the situation by standing between Norwood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106032 - 2017-09-21
,” or something to that effect. When Shade attempted to de-escalate the situation by standing between Norwood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106032 - 2017-09-21