Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14541 - 14550 of 68814 for had.

State v. James B. Johnson
., a misdemeanor.[1] The sole issue is whether the evidence was sufficient to establish that Johnson had committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9019 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas C. Nelson
the sentence. The court reporter subsequently informed this court that she had lost her transcription notes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10288 - 2005-03-31

T. William Cook v. Walworth County Board of Adjustment
. We conclude that Walworth County had the right to amend its zoning ordinance and require the Cooks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12883 - 2005-03-31

Chris J. Jacobs v. Gary R. McCaughtry
that Muraski had attempted to physically intimidate him. ΒΆ4 Jacobs received a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6259 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
as to whether there was a nuisance; that the building inspector had not been properly sworn into office
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95652 - 2013-04-15

[PDF] NOTICE
counsel testified. The circuit court found that the State had proven by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27777 - 2014-09-15

County of Lacrosse v. Richard H. Masrud
at the posted speed limit of 45 m.p.h. and entered the intersection after the traffic signal had turned yellow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9049 - 2005-03-31

State v. James D. Luedtke
in exchange for sentencing concessions. Luedtke then proceeded to enter his no contest plea, as he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10779 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James A. Shives v. William L. Powell
that they, rather than Powell, had the burden of proof. The facts that the circuit court specifically adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15539 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Alexander Grubor
of evidence in the courtroom should not have been a surprise since the court had previously ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4237 - 2017-09-19