Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14551 - 14560 of 24724 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Total Biaya Membangun Taman Mini Buat Rumah Minimalis Wonosegoro Boyolali.

Douglas County v. Steven Leinweber
the “totality of the circumstances.” Id. at 139-40. ¶7 In this case the two-step standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2224 - 2005-03-31

State v. Chad A. Demerath
to reasonably suspect a violation has been or will be committed. Id. Probable cause exists where the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21124 - 2006-01-30

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
was presented by his attorney. Based on the totality of the circumstances in this case, this court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27383 - 2006-12-11

State v. Cleveland Brown
difficulties. ¶16 We conclude that under the totality of the circumstances, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19345 - 2005-08-22

[PDF] State v. David L. Fries
is the same as that for all arrests: The totality of the circumstances must be examined to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11602 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
1 The total possible exposure was sixty-five years’ imprisonment: sixty years for the Class B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43370 - 2014-09-15

State v. Andres Godina
recommendation and “impose the consecutive time which totals 18 months in the county jail.” In his sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13092 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
allegation and imposed total prison time of four years, followed by three years of probation.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15440 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the motion. It found that “when considering the totality of the comments in the sentencing document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29

State v. John A. Aschenbrener
an “absolutist approach” that would require proof of “total or complete lack of control,” but concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3326 - 2005-03-31