Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14561 - 14570 of 83864 for case number.
Search results 14561 - 14570 of 83864 for case number.
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Alonna L. Koenig
WIS. STAT. § 59.34(1)(c) did not apply in this case. We disagree and affirm the judgment. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6625 - 2017-09-19
WIS. STAT. § 59.34(1)(c) did not apply in this case. We disagree and affirm the judgment. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6625 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
meritorious arguments. We conclude that is the case here. ¶16 Durigan’s brief offers a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41950 - 2014-09-15
meritorious arguments. We conclude that is the case here. ¶16 Durigan’s brief offers a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41950 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Gerald G. Geyso v. Richard Daly
2005 WI App 18 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 04-0748
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7384 - 2017-09-20
2005 WI App 18 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 04-0748
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7384 - 2017-09-20
Production Credit Association of Southeast Wisconsin v. Gorton Farms
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11626 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11626 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and lucid when I’ve talked to him, he’s understood the facts of the case, the law, his options, and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44871 - 2009-12-21
and lucid when I’ve talked to him, he’s understood the facts of the case, the law, his options, and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44871 - 2009-12-21
State v. Darryl A. Harding
nonetheless conclude that he simply lacked sufficient facts necessary to justify the stop in this case. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4008 - 2005-03-31
nonetheless conclude that he simply lacked sufficient facts necessary to justify the stop in this case. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4008 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dale R. Wiegert
§§ 939.62 and 973.12, Stats., to the undisputed facts of this case. See State v. Theriault, 187 Wis.2d 125
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15069 - 2005-03-31
§§ 939.62 and 973.12, Stats., to the undisputed facts of this case. See State v. Theriault, 187 Wis.2d 125
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven Levsen v. Medical College of Wisconsin
. The medical college then called Ms. Rinke during its case; it is during this examination that the Levsens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15252 - 2017-09-21
. The medical college then called Ms. Rinke during its case; it is during this examination that the Levsens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15252 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James H. Dumke
2001 WI 122 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-1338-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16509 - 2017-09-21
2001 WI 122 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-1338-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16509 - 2017-09-21
Steven Levsen v. Medical College of Wisconsin
was excused at that time. The medical college then called Ms. Rinke during its case; it is during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15252 - 2008-12-11
was excused at that time. The medical college then called Ms. Rinke during its case; it is during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15252 - 2008-12-11