Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14561 - 14570 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14561 - 14570 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
James Munroe v. Dykstra
). This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11628 - 2017-09-19
). This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11628 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that Unified may be arguing for a de novo standard of review. We do not address this line of argument because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55769 - 2014-09-15
that Unified may be arguing for a de novo standard of review. We do not address this line of argument because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55769 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 4 Again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149117 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 4 Again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149117 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that our review is de novo. We disagree. Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 54.68(4), the circuit court may remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63166 - 2011-04-25
that our review is de novo. We disagree. Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 54.68(4), the circuit court may remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63166 - 2011-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
De Peters filed the no-merit report. Attorney Olivia Garman was later substituted as appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029613 - 2025-10-28
De Peters filed the no-merit report. Attorney Olivia Garman was later substituted as appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029613 - 2025-10-28
County of Walworth v. Glen E. Kelly
court’s conclusions of law and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
court’s conclusions of law and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the applicable law de novo. Id. Here, Wenz does not challenge the circuit court’s findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112226 - 2017-09-21
to the applicable law de novo. Id. Here, Wenz does not challenge the circuit court’s findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112226 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, which this court reviews de novo. See id. Following an evidentiary hearing, the postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570471 - 2022-09-27
, which this court reviews de novo. See id. Following an evidentiary hearing, the postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570471 - 2022-09-27
[PDF]
State v. Randy A. Davis
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5835 - 2017-09-19
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5835 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ericka Clark v. Devin R. Mudge, M.D.
court’s discretionary determination involving a question of law, we review the question of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14980 - 2017-09-21
court’s discretionary determination involving a question of law, we review the question of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14980 - 2017-09-21