Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14561 - 14570 of 20930 for word.
Search results 14561 - 14570 of 20930 for word.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage.” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448055 - 2021-11-02
reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage.” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448055 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
would have held true. In other words, when asked specifically about his motives for testifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66224 - 2014-09-15
would have held true. In other words, when asked specifically about his motives for testifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66224 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Matthew Gray
that the like result was not repeated by mere chance or coincidence.” Id. “In other words, ‘if a like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14307 - 2014-09-15
that the like result was not repeated by mere chance or coincidence.” Id. “In other words, ‘if a like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14307 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James D. Paulson
, the court concluded: [T]he word, “reasonably,” saves the ordinance from the infirmity of vagueness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3117 - 2017-09-20
, the court concluded: [T]he word, “reasonably,” saves the ordinance from the infirmity of vagueness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3117 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Douglas County v. Michael R.L.
of the statute is unambiguous, we give its words their ordinary meaning. See Wisconsin Bankers Ass’n v. Mutual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7666 - 2017-09-19
of the statute is unambiguous, we give its words their ordinary meaning. See Wisconsin Bankers Ass’n v. Mutual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7666 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Judy Palmerton v. Associates' Health and Welfare Plan
) are made to clarify previous Plan wording. No. 02-1741 5 ¶4 In August 1998, the Palmertons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5427 - 2017-09-19
) are made to clarify previous Plan wording. No. 02-1741 5 ¶4 In August 1998, the Palmertons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5427 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Peter A. Moss
was earmarked for a Texas store. He provided no proof other than his word that an out-of-state business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3161 - 2017-09-19
was earmarked for a Texas store. He provided no proof other than his word that an out-of-state business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3161 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bobby G. Grant
judge never explained to the defendant the need for a unanimous jury. In other words, the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14340 - 2014-09-15
judge never explained to the defendant the need for a unanimous jury. In other words, the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14340 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
he was not injured. In other words, Lamb contends, because the court excluded the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80138 - 2014-09-15
he was not injured. In other words, Lamb contends, because the court excluded the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80138 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mollie Place v. City of Milwaukee
remote, the jury might have drawn improperly from the few words the assistant city attorney said before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7177 - 2017-09-20
remote, the jury might have drawn improperly from the few words the assistant city attorney said before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7177 - 2017-09-20