Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14571 - 14580 of 50086 for our.
Search results 14571 - 14580 of 50086 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the community. Id., ¶98. Our review of the sentencing court’s comments leads us to conclude that there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197462 - 2017-10-11
in the community. Id., ¶98. Our review of the sentencing court’s comments leads us to conclude that there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197462 - 2017-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP1668 2 our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156068 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP1668 2 our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156068 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 260 N.W.2d 727 (1978). Our review is limited to the trial court’s sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112569 - 2017-09-21
, 260 N.W.2d 727 (1978). Our review is limited to the trial court’s sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112569 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter Edge
. As is evident from the standard of review set forth in Carviou and Marhal, our role on review is quite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10608 - 2005-03-31
. As is evident from the standard of review set forth in Carviou and Marhal, our role on review is quite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10608 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The jail documents would not have probably led to acquittal and do not undermine our confidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12
. The jail documents would not have probably led to acquittal and do not undermine our confidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP933-CRNM 2 After our independent review of the record, the no-merit report, and Jordan’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515422 - 2022-05-04
. No. 2020AP933-CRNM 2 After our independent review of the record, the no-merit report, and Jordan’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515422 - 2022-05-04
CA Blank Order
a response but has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95819 - 2013-04-23
a response but has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95819 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After our 1 All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529973 - 2022-06-09
. After our 1 All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529973 - 2022-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the materials that the circuit court considered in addressing that challenge. At our direction, Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500487 - 2022-03-29
of the materials that the circuit court considered in addressing that challenge. At our direction, Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500487 - 2022-03-29
[PDF]
State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
stated that it “d[id not] dispute … [Pozo’s] statement.” The trial court, however, citing our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12275 - 2017-09-21
stated that it “d[id not] dispute … [Pozo’s] statement.” The trial court, however, citing our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12275 - 2017-09-21