Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14571 - 14580 of 63609 for records/1000.
Search results 14571 - 14580 of 63609 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to file a response, and he has responded. After reviewing the record, counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
was advised of his right to file a response, and he has responded. After reviewing the record, counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
State v. Timothy J. Jeske
nature of the crime; the record of past criminal offenses; any history of undesirable behavior patterns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20425 - 2005-11-29
nature of the crime; the record of past criminal offenses; any history of undesirable behavior patterns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20425 - 2005-11-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237622 - 2019-03-19
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237622 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1967). Baker did not file a response. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295861 - 2020-10-14
(1967). Baker did not file a response. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295861 - 2020-10-14
Elizabeth H. v. Malcolm H.
, the trial court found Malcolm in contempt based upon a recorded telephone conversation in the spring of 1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11377 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court found Malcolm in contempt based upon a recorded telephone conversation in the spring of 1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
). The no-merit review in the mother’s appeal was based on the record shared with Richard’s appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93281 - 2014-09-15
). The no-merit review in the mother’s appeal was based on the record shared with Richard’s appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93281 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
memorandum briefs. Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the judgment appealed in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11565 - 2017-09-19
memorandum briefs. Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the judgment appealed in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11565 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
lack of any prior adult criminal record; secondly, the sentence imposed exceeded the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30619 - 2007-10-16
lack of any prior adult criminal record; secondly, the sentence imposed exceeded the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30619 - 2007-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
to trial. We conclude that the evidence in the record supports the trial court’s decision, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51829 - 2010-07-07
to trial. We conclude that the evidence in the record supports the trial court’s decision, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51829 - 2010-07-07
[PDF]
State v. James Darius Jones
failed to satisfy either prong. The record reflects that postconviction counsel did raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6561 - 2017-09-19
failed to satisfy either prong. The record reflects that postconviction counsel did raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6561 - 2017-09-19