Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14571 - 14580 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 14571 - 14580 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Dean T. Schaefer
to the United States Constitution protects “[t]he right of the people ... against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7597 - 2017-09-19
to the United States Constitution protects “[t]he right of the people ... against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7597 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dean T. Schaefer
to the United States Constitution protects “[t]he right of the people ... against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7596 - 2017-09-19
to the United States Constitution protects “[t]he right of the people ... against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7596 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). We may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76882 - 2014-09-15
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). We may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76882 - 2014-09-15
Village of McFarland v. Dennis L. Preston
does not prohibit such an expansion of the investigation in this case; and (2) the officer had reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11276 - 2005-03-31
does not prohibit such an expansion of the investigation in this case; and (2) the officer had reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11276 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dean T. Schaefer
unreasonable searches and seizures.” While an investigative stop is technically a “seizure” under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7596 - 2005-03-31
unreasonable searches and seizures.” While an investigative stop is technically a “seizure” under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7596 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of the procedural bar under the particular facts and circumstances of the case.” Id., ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52533 - 2010-07-26
the application of the procedural bar under the particular facts and circumstances of the case.” Id., ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52533 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
. The police asked Cancel, who owned the home, for permission to search her home, which Cancel granted both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54139 - 2010-09-07
. The police asked Cancel, who owned the home, for permission to search her home, which Cancel granted both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54139 - 2010-09-07
Elizabeth M. Gibson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
because he is deceased. It is this court’s duty to search the record for credible evidence to sustain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11026 - 2005-03-31
because he is deceased. It is this court’s duty to search the record for credible evidence to sustain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11026 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). We may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76882 - 2012-01-23
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). We may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76882 - 2012-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
to sustain the jury’s verdict; we do not search for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61684 - 2011-03-29
to sustain the jury’s verdict; we do not search for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61684 - 2011-03-29